12/10/2018 Lack of Differentiation, If you know how people read others. Can't you just do the opposite?Read Now A Sort of Final Result of a Social Psychology Class. Topic relating to categorizing and Racism. Since most of Social Psychology focuses on that idea of reading people. Discrimination/Being Prejudice/Racist isn’t motivating yourself. That isn’t going to motivate others, unless the goal is to annoy/irritate someone by being racist towards them. To cause that someone to perhaps lash out at you, If thats your goal by trying to start/motivate a fight: basically the only thing being racist is going to get you, is into a fight.. I think mixing the term ‘Racist’ with the different term ‘Categorizing’ is a dangerous idea. Since categorizing is often how brains process information. Also people have a self image that often expands outside of just themselves, unless they have no contact with others then that self image is a loner/soloist. Also if you are completely solo there is a chance that no-one will know what your self image is. When a self image is shared then you start to enter into the idea of groupthink and popularity relating to possible social pressures: that can expand into different group competitions. Its highly unlikely that your group can include an entire continent/larger then island size landmass.
- In The typical social psychology textbook: the answer for victims of prejudice is a man named Amadou Diallo who was shot 41 times by police because the police ‘thought’ he had a gun shaped like a wallet? The textbook also brings up that Amadup Diallo was african american, so it may have been a racial crime by the police relating to a failure of groupthink and racializing threats/having prejudice towards a group. Also in that example, Amadup Diallo wasn’t in a group like the police were… So why so many shots? The police already had em out numbered… The example shows there is a sort of failure relating towards police reading people and failing to know the difference between a wallet and a gun.. Now as for the tittle of this post: if you know how people read others. Can’t you just do the opposite??? Is perhaps the idea on why the basic information on reading emotions and human facial expressions isn’t taught much earlier.. Example is Police don't read people. This type of psychology is kind of restricted.. Should be taught to all much earlier since you/others don’t really know what people will do, and that is almost applies x2 for younger kids because they have more time to live and change. Perhaps also a reason why medicine doesn’t advance faster since people are typically unstable and even if someone is stable for longer, that stability can change in the brain when they age… To conclude, the idea of reading people; are ideas that should-be taught to police, and to those who are interested in that topic. Despite the idea that people can manipulate the information of reading people. So even if reading facial expressions is taught earlier on publicly or not.. Does reading people’s facial expressions really help understand the person you are trying to read?? IDK. Comments are closed.
|
Details
This page is just one of the many pages regarding the idea of: Changing The Teaching Industry HERE Selection Page |