12/10/2018 Lack of Differentiation, If you know how people read others. Can't you just do the opposite?Read Now A Sort of Final Result of a Social Psychology Class. Topic relating to categorizing and Racism. Since most of Social Psychology focuses on that idea of reading people. Discrimination/Being Prejudice/Racist isn’t motivating yourself. That isn’t going to motivate others, unless the goal is to annoy/irritate someone by being racist towards them. To cause that someone to perhaps lash out at you, If thats your goal by trying to start/motivate a fight: basically the only thing being racist is going to get you, is into a fight.. I think mixing the term ‘Racist’ with the different term ‘Categorizing’ is a dangerous idea. Since categorizing is often how brains process information. Also people have a self image that often expands outside of just themselves, unless they have no contact with others then that self image is a loner/soloist. Also if you are completely solo there is a chance that no-one will know what your self image is. When a self image is shared then you start to enter into the idea of groupthink and popularity relating to possible social pressures: that can expand into different group competitions. Its highly unlikely that your group can include an entire continent/larger then island size landmass.
- In The typical social psychology textbook: the answer for victims of prejudice is a man named Amadou Diallo who was shot 41 times by police because the police ‘thought’ he had a gun shaped like a wallet? The textbook also brings up that Amadup Diallo was african american, so it may have been a racial crime by the police relating to a failure of groupthink and racializing threats/having prejudice towards a group. Also in that example, Amadup Diallo wasn’t in a group like the police were… So why so many shots? The police already had em out numbered… The example shows there is a sort of failure relating towards police reading people and failing to know the difference between a wallet and a gun.. Now as for the tittle of this post: if you know how people read others. Can’t you just do the opposite??? Is perhaps the idea on why the basic information on reading emotions and human facial expressions isn’t taught much earlier.. Example is Police don't read people. This type of psychology is kind of restricted.. Should be taught to all much earlier since you/others don’t really know what people will do, and that is almost applies x2 for younger kids because they have more time to live and change. Perhaps also a reason why medicine doesn’t advance faster since people are typically unstable and even if someone is stable for longer, that stability can change in the brain when they age… To conclude, the idea of reading people; are ideas that should-be taught to police, and to those who are interested in that topic. Despite the idea that people can manipulate the information of reading people. So even if reading facial expressions is taught earlier on publicly or not.. Does reading people’s facial expressions really help understand the person you are trying to read?? IDK. Lack of Differentiation, For Adolescence The Basic Space: 21st Century Expanded....
What is missing from high-school and middle-school education is more real life experiences regarding the gaining of useful knowledge for an evolving society. The easiest thing for most to think of during this time is technology and associate that with evolving. The amount of school work cuts people’s social lives in half, usually its more; at which point that work needs to be specialized. Teachers need to evolve themselves. It’s more then just, try and ask the class about what classes they as students would like to take towards their end goal in life. Of course that is for teacher younger students, I feel adolescence students should already be able to take classes relating towards their personal end goal(s) relating to their personal preference: that should-be the majority of classes they are taking. I would also like to add that many students don’t get many options to talk about what they want to do in life, and be given more options to help improve the success of that students life goal. By learning from someone with that experience regarding at least some success on the subject the student finds useful.. Ultimately near adults don’t have the option to pick what they want to do, something that should-happen much sooner then it typically does in the current system. Most schools don't know what is important and what isn't. “China’s most important ambitions are in artificial intelligence. This is the space race of the 21st century, but one with a much more direct impact on the lives and livelihoods of citizens. The biggest technological breakthroughs in AI will demand the kind of planning and investment that the U.S.A. once poured into the Manhattan Project or the race to the moon. However, the U.S.A. government no longer has the political will to muster this kind of sustained long-term commitment and has outsourced innovation to Silicon Valley. U.S.A. tech firms will have the advantage, if the race to develop AI depends mainly on experimentation and innovation in multiple areas at once. But China is the better bet to win if the decisive factor is depth of commitment to a single goal and the depth of pockets in pursuing it… 87.8% of manufacturing jobs lost in the U.S.A. between 2000 and 2010 were the result of automation and improved technology,” (Ian Bremmer). If you remove the technology from schools as something that is forbidden or not taught regularly, you are failing your students. In many cases the content in those situations are forced. Where students are unable to pick the content areas they want. There needs to be some sort of compromise where the basics are taught which include: English, Math, History, Science, and Technology. Major state tests often lack in testing for technology and fail in also testing for the major events of history. I feel part of the reason is due to the lack of historians doing actual writing while there is also a lack of real resources regarding important events. There’s a lack of collaboration with areas when regarding world history. The lack of information in history causes a less complete understanding of the values that are supposed to be supported. Example: World History/Social Studies doesn’t have a section in the standardized testing in the U.S.A. The idea of having technology on the standardized state testing as its own section is something that is also completely lacking. Thus showing how the schools need improvement in the basics. These 5 topics (English, Math, History, Science, and Technology) should be what the state worries about, because if you don’t understand technology at least a little bit, your opportunities to just get an income are less then 15%. History and Social Studies teaches people how to avoid stupidity. It tells of how humans evolve, which often feels like a long process, but people complain they don’t live long enough. History talks about how humans move from nothing to something more business and logical. Source: How China’s Economy is poised to win the Future. Ian Bremmer. Article. 2018. Note: Wasn't really sure where to put this article:
Also May the 4th's Force Be With You, its a thing. Share the moon. I also did an interview of students, asking what they wanted to learn about. Although this was done awhile ago, it shows that I’ve done what many other teachers and the school system don’t do, at least until high school and college: where there remains to be major restrictions Located HERE If you want an additional article about space, got that 2 if you haven't checked it out yet HERE: https://www.royalroad.com/fiction/22104/the-homeless-into-space-program/chapter/315786/the-homeless-into-space-program There
Lack of Differentiation : Pedagogy - Professor Prestome Ungyobrock I would like to think that public education is always improving. That neighbor hoods of less wealth will grow in wealth. Because when there isn’t an equal starting point, there should be that opportunity to at least know ideas that can help them improve their financial status. And when there are successful ideas stemming from student growth related to their interest: there is potential for evolutionary growth. The more options there are too achieve that the better. It is unfair that there is still a problem relating to public education unfair treatment. For a rough quote about the current education industry that’s focus is more about: The have and have not’s regarding financial stability. “A paradox of educational inequality. Since Schools remain among the few institutions that produce opportunities to contest structural inequalities… We believe that urban students should-go to college at equal rates to their more affluent counterparts… If school achievement were an accurate measure of intellect: achievement patters would closely mirror the random distribution of intellect that genetic scientists report in human populations. Instead, the results of schools are quite predictable. This lack of equality is true because the nation’s poorest young people are the most likely to be denied access to a quality education and then to be blamed for their academic failure due to the lack of resources etc.” (Duncan Andrade, Pages 1-10). There are people who believe that diversity isn't working in work/school environments, but the fact is true equality hasn't been achieved yet. People can't claim diversity doesn't work when it isn't fully implemented. I agree that schools should help sort kids into their roles in society, but that role should be an option for the student to explore. The more options the better for the student. However a student not having free will, to investigate different types of work, that they are interested in: doesn’t create the best workers in any field. That’s just some of my experience relating towards just going though classes, based more on dictatorship then freedom. My major is history and I’ve written alot about society and of course war. I’ve read or at least skimmed though, a decent amount of Nazi inspired writing. Pedagogy of Oppressed, by Paulo Freire: I think can be included as one those Nazi Documents. Where the writing’s main focus is to discourage revolution and stop equal education. In the 2 chapters that I’ve read of it, Paulo Freire, who is a clear fan of Karl Marx and the way that Nazi German schools were ran during the second world war. Where ideas like, “In order to regain their humanity they must cease to be things and fight as men and women.” (Paulo Freire, Chapter 1). The sentence alone, as well as pretty much all of his writing: views people, regardless if they get education or not: as things. Then the sentence encourages the things to go out and fight until they die. This is a typical Military idea, that isn’t limited to Nazi’s. I think the teacher excerpt/summary is well done, since its focus is about: how the original pedagogy of oppressed encourages human-drone ideologies where human personalities are destroyed to create mindless zombies or meat shield for the army. Done so through education prisons, “The capability of banking education to minimize or annul the student's creative power and to stimulate their credulity serves the interests of the oppressors, who care neither to have the world revealed nor to see it transformed.” (Excerpt Paulo Freire) Since that is the goal of the the original document, Pedagogy of Oppressed. However, the Excerpt/summary of the real document also leaves out a few important ideas. Such as how the actual document also reflects on the reality of learning from suffering, rather that pain is physical or mental. Ultimately many Nazi documents often go into more detail about the simple idea of learning from your mistakes and how if someone is over pampered with nothing new to learn that person then can’t evolve. Pain, is an important part of human development. Even when you think of muscle development, a muscle is destroyed before it is built back up stronger. This of course reflect most military laws by building 'stronger' soldiers. “The interests of the oppressors lie in ‘changing the consciousness of the oppressed, not the situation which oppresses them’. For the more the oppressed can be led to adapt to that situation, the more easily they can be dominated. To achieve this end, the oppressors use the banking concept of education in conjunction with a paternalistic social action apparatus, within which the oppressed receive the euphemistic title of ‘welfare recipients.’ They are treated as individual cases, as marginal persons who deviate from the general configuration of a ‘good, organized, and just’ society. The oppressed are regarded as the pathology of the healthy society, which must therefore adjust these ‘incompetent and lazy’ folk to its own patterns by changing their mentality.” (Paulo Freire Chapter 2). That quote also goes into detail towards the authors bias of hating the homeless. Instead of perhaps blaming the lack of freedom in the education industry and the lack of available jobs. The focus of many Nazi related documents such as Paulo Freire’s writing there is a strong desire to increase military efforts at all costs to increase available employable staff relating towards military jobs. Sources:
The Citing Battle Is Really Just Biased Opinions Towards Others: or just a reason to manipulate the book market by making money on reprinting: by doing nothing new of their own....
I/professor prestome ungyobrock, write this in response to the battle of publication citing. For all my quotes, I keep things simple. I was just talking about it and it seems I am always finding my self explaining it.. Which has only recently come to my attention that there was even a ‘battle’ its just more of a waste of paper reprinting problem. Where people place their education status on how they cite something. But really its a preference. Some teachers/writing sites want more information about your final source page. All you really need is: The Publications/Writing Pieces' Name, The main Author/creator, Type such as Movie/Article/Book, and it's release date/time. Reprinting a book for example just to change the book's citing style is a waste of paper, it should-just be printed regularly. If you want to reprint something, there should-be more printing into different languages… Of course that basic idea isn't applied, because schools don't have culturally respective teaching in place. Where reprinting actually makes since so it can get new readers.. So instead students are forced to buy a 3rd edition and even the 8th version of the same original book, where all versions are in English... Like worry about citing order doesn’t get readers… To me, regarding how my students will cite their papers: I leave it up to them, as it should-be. A author and even a student should-be able to pick the citing they want, and in reality its really not a big deal. As a guy who has sort of published a couple things history or other. There really is a problem in strict English classes regarding the forcing of the teachers biased citing preference. For my preference that's underlined, it's simple. Other teachers try to make you work more, effort that doesn't get you more results. Forcing someone to pick something as simple as conforming into a single or only strict-citing style is a waste of the teacher and forceful individual time. Since, that individual may like one style over another, give the kids some sort of freedom**** Okay so there are at least 3, basically the same types of citing your sources. APA, Chicago Style, and MLA. That’s just how it is, but as for my suggestion towards Nazi-English Teachers just explaining the citation examples and letting kids pick what they like is best. I personally use a lazy form of Chicago Style. Because, that’s the style I picked. I have a personal history of refusing or just straight up ignoring teachers, even professional teachers regarding their rules on citation. Since, Its just never been a big deal to me… I just take the point loss or what ever.. Forcing kids to be robots and conform to 1 style is kind of like copying. Copying others regarding your peers, in my opinion without giving some reference of their help, is just giving up your own freedom of speech. By taking another person’s writing, or just lets say turning in what another has written.. You have given up your chance to write something new.. You have given into the system, something that isn’t even you… That’s the message I have told a few students. Better to just take that low grade and do it yourself; instead of copying for a possible higher grade. For those who just want to argue or dis-on my lazy citing; here's the rant for my simple citing style. It's a form of Chicago Style, I think Chicago is the best. Mine is just more simplified and here is why I use it. To start Chicago is far better then APA or MLA. But again, you can use whatever you like… For the Chicago Style: The tittle of the article/book/ETC being listed first is the most important in my opinion because that is the thing:pdf/book/blog post/forum title/Poetry example that you are looking at. Most authors write many extensive books and articles. So listing the name of the particular writing you are looking at is the most critical. What I do in my lazy form of the Chicago Style is when looking at a Second piece of writing or creation by the same person; I just add a few dots…. And put the second article/book etc that I am referencing... after listening the tittle(s). The Authors’ full name is critical. Since there are tons of authors with the same last name, all citing styles should include the 1st and last name of author. So only putting a last name is the worst way to cite in any style. Making sure you can cite the full name, gives that author/person/student the credibility they deserve as the author: world isn’t ending if you get it slightly wrong: relax... After all, there are hundreds of people with the same first and last name. That problem is that whole other issue of oppression, and useless new book additions.. Third after writing the authors name, in the lazy Chicago Style I use. Simply noting what it is you are viewing perhaps a video perhaps an article etc. Some citing styles require who a publishing company, but that's a waste of time because books just keep getting republished: so I highly suggest omitting that in whatever style you are using.. Finally, just type the date/year the book/article/video was created or when you viewed it. Sometimes I use when it was updated, sometimes I use when it was originally released, or both. As a final Note: spending time typing out URL’s and World Wide Web links; like the specific location, just takes up to much space in your own paper. I found that out in grade school. Most grade school kids would agree that a location such as a URL for the internet, is very annoying to write out/copy paste. However, as someone from a modern generation, noting URL’s is pointless because HTTPs/URL’s/WWW's constantly change. They can be altered at any time. For example a website shuts down or your video gets blocked for no reason at all. Which, will automatically cause the URL to fail. So citing the URL in any of the 3 professional citing styles is a waste of time. When someone could be doing something greater like protecting the article they like from life’s destructive stupidity. A URL isn’t always permanent since they often get shut down when someone who owns that URL dies or is unable to pay for the URL. There are honestly lots of reasons why URL’s aren’t exactly needed attached to a paper, in my opinion/history of growing up with the internet… Why URLS found themselves being tacked onto every citing style is ridiculous and again a waste of time for everyone when a website crashes. But if you want to cite the exact spot then go for it… It can be easier to find the article/resource/book etc online if you do have it but really, people need to just relax. Source Example: Impulsive People Lead Everyone To Get Involved in War. Professor Prestome Ungyobrock. Books. 2017. Culturally Responsive Teaching is still new, and developing. I think to really be a teacher who teachers difficult cultures, that teacher would need to go abroad into an environment where they aren't familiar. Like a different country then their birth place. I have a limited perspective on how school districts work in other countries/actually different demographic areas. However: When looking at abroad topics many schools around the world focus on similar ideas such: Wake up, go to school, have 2 to 3 classes that are in the list of :: Studying the Language based on region of birth, In rare occasions studying of a second language, Math, Science, History, Physical Education. Have some sort of lunch and have 1-3 more classes from that list: then go home. That is the basic idea pretty much everywhere that has modern education. So if educations structure is mostly the same on a global level: understanding your own demographic area where you were born should-be easy for you. Also when talking about subjects like Math, it is the same regardless of demographics. I personally find it odd that people care so much about demographics. A bad demographic area is typically based on the areas lack of jobs. An area without financial income from families going in to help the schools funding results in bad schools and visa versa. There is an article called: The 10 worst neighborhoods in Long Beach for 2018. The article by Sam Sparkes, determines that the bad neighborhoods based on available entertainment, high-Unemployment, Low Income, Low Home Values. These problems often result in Higher Crime rates since it becomes more difficult for people to survive when there isn’t an opportunity to earn money. This is typically how areas are categorized. So when looking at areas and school that don’t have resources: lessons often can’t involve modern technology. In many cases lessons of teachers can’t even include books because of the lack of resources. This of course decreases the effectiveness of school.. I find that Lessons of MLK (Dr. Martin Luther King) for example are often a great lesson to give to areas that are lacking in diversity. Rather that area is rich or poor, an area lacking in culture, or for an area that hasn't experienced immigration; give students the MLK lessons. There are many areas today that are lacking in world perspective.. A culturally isolated area, that is lacking in foreigners is a culturally boring area lacking in diversity. MLK was and is all about bridging and reminding people of equality. MLK battled with areas which restricted and segregated against other humans: his goal was to create a better and more culturally responsive environment. As for a school examination of their demographics I just randomly selected one: Forrest Elementary District, AZ. The Demographic is over 80% Female and about 19% male. So I thought that was interesting. I’ve only been in a few classes where there were more female then males. Definitely haven't been in a school where every class is like that, but I don’t believe a school that is mostly female would be an issue for anyone. Sources: Sam Sparkes. These Are The 10 Worst Neighborhoods in Long Beach for 2018. December 2017. Article. Roadsnacks.net/worst-neighborhoods. ProximityOne. Forrest Elementary District AZ. General Demographic Characteristics. Updated 2018, Article. http://proximityone.com/az_sdc.htm Lack of Differentiation. + Plus |
Details
This page is just one of the many pages regarding the idea of: Changing The Teaching Industry HERE Selection Page |