The Citing Battle Is Really Just Biased Opinions Towards Others: or just a reason to manipulate the book market by making money on reprinting: by doing nothing new of their own....
I/professor prestome ungyobrock, write this in response to the battle of publication citing. For all my quotes, I keep things simple. I was just talking about it and it seems I am always finding my self explaining it.. Which has only recently come to my attention that there was even a ‘battle’ its just more of a waste of paper reprinting problem. Where people place their education status on how they cite something. But really its a preference. Some teachers/writing sites want more information about your final source page. All you really need is: The Publications/Writing Pieces' Name, The main Author/creator, Type such as Movie/Article/Book, and it's release date/time. Reprinting a book for example just to change the book's citing style is a waste of paper, it should-just be printed regularly. If you want to reprint something, there should-be more printing into different languages… Of course that basic idea isn't applied, because schools don't have culturally respective teaching in place. Where reprinting actually makes since so it can get new readers.. So instead students are forced to buy a 3rd edition and even the 8th version of the same original book, where all versions are in English... Like worry about citing order doesn’t get readers… To me, regarding how my students will cite their papers: I leave it up to them, as it should-be. A author and even a student should-be able to pick the citing they want, and in reality its really not a big deal. As a guy who has sort of published a couple things history or other. There really is a problem in strict English classes regarding the forcing of the teachers biased citing preference. For my preference that's underlined, it's simple. Other teachers try to make you work more, effort that doesn't get you more results. Forcing someone to pick something as simple as conforming into a single or only strict-citing style is a waste of the teacher and forceful individual time. Since, that individual may like one style over another, give the kids some sort of freedom**** Okay so there are at least 3, basically the same types of citing your sources. APA, Chicago Style, and MLA. That’s just how it is, but as for my suggestion towards Nazi-English Teachers just explaining the citation examples and letting kids pick what they like is best. I personally use a lazy form of Chicago Style. Because, that’s the style I picked. I have a personal history of refusing or just straight up ignoring teachers, even professional teachers regarding their rules on citation. Since, Its just never been a big deal to me… I just take the point loss or what ever.. Forcing kids to be robots and conform to 1 style is kind of like copying. Copying others regarding your peers, in my opinion without giving some reference of their help, is just giving up your own freedom of speech. By taking another person’s writing, or just lets say turning in what another has written.. You have given up your chance to write something new.. You have given into the system, something that isn’t even you… That’s the message I have told a few students. Better to just take that low grade and do it yourself; instead of copying for a possible higher grade. For those who just want to argue or dis-on my lazy citing; here's the rant for my simple citing style. It's a form of Chicago Style, I think Chicago is the best. Mine is just more simplified and here is why I use it. To start Chicago is far better then APA or MLA. But again, you can use whatever you like… For the Chicago Style: The tittle of the article/book/ETC being listed first is the most important in my opinion because that is the thing:pdf/book/blog post/forum title/Poetry example that you are looking at. Most authors write many extensive books and articles. So listing the name of the particular writing you are looking at is the most critical. What I do in my lazy form of the Chicago Style is when looking at a Second piece of writing or creation by the same person; I just add a few dots…. And put the second article/book etc that I am referencing... after listening the tittle(s). The Authors’ full name is critical. Since there are tons of authors with the same last name, all citing styles should include the 1st and last name of author. So only putting a last name is the worst way to cite in any style. Making sure you can cite the full name, gives that author/person/student the credibility they deserve as the author: world isn’t ending if you get it slightly wrong: relax... After all, there are hundreds of people with the same first and last name. That problem is that whole other issue of oppression, and useless new book additions.. Third after writing the authors name, in the lazy Chicago Style I use. Simply noting what it is you are viewing perhaps a video perhaps an article etc. Some citing styles require who a publishing company, but that's a waste of time because books just keep getting republished: so I highly suggest omitting that in whatever style you are using.. Finally, just type the date/year the book/article/video was created or when you viewed it. Sometimes I use when it was updated, sometimes I use when it was originally released, or both. As a final Note: spending time typing out URL’s and World Wide Web links; like the specific location, just takes up to much space in your own paper. I found that out in grade school. Most grade school kids would agree that a location such as a URL for the internet, is very annoying to write out/copy paste. However, as someone from a modern generation, noting URL’s is pointless because HTTPs/URL’s/WWW's constantly change. They can be altered at any time. For example a website shuts down or your video gets blocked for no reason at all. Which, will automatically cause the URL to fail. So citing the URL in any of the 3 professional citing styles is a waste of time. When someone could be doing something greater like protecting the article they like from life’s destructive stupidity. A URL isn’t always permanent since they often get shut down when someone who owns that URL dies or is unable to pay for the URL. There are honestly lots of reasons why URL’s aren’t exactly needed attached to a paper, in my opinion/history of growing up with the internet… Why URLS found themselves being tacked onto every citing style is ridiculous and again a waste of time for everyone when a website crashes. But if you want to cite the exact spot then go for it… It can be easier to find the article/resource/book etc online if you do have it but really, people need to just relax. Source Example: Impulsive People Lead Everyone To Get Involved in War. Professor Prestome Ungyobrock. Books. 2017. Comments are closed.
|
Details
This page is just one of the many pages regarding the idea of: Changing The Teaching Industry HERE Selection Page |